Abstract
The discussion section is considered as a crucial part in the writing process of a research article (RA). Research writers find it difficult to write an effective discussion for their results and this could be due to the unawareness of the various move functions that shape this section. A rhetorical move is a sentence or group of sentences that serves a communicative function. This paper focuses on move Background information, its linguistic devices such as verb, tense, and self-reference and lexical bundles (LBs) including 3- to 5-word bundles that are used to construct this communicative move. The corpus of the study includes a total of 50 medical RAs discussion section which were selected from five prestigious journals in the field. The corpus was analysed in terms of the occurrence of move Background information, the linguistic devices associated with this move and the LBs that initiate it. The analysis of the move and the linguistic realizations was done manually and the identification of LBs was done using AntConc3.5.7w computer program. The findings revealed that 34 (64%) of the corpus included move Background information. This move was mainly employed to describe methodological aspects and restate the research purpose. These functions were characterized by the use of procedural verbs, first-person plural pronouns and simple past tense. Moreover, several 3 - 5 words LBs (e.g., we tested the hypothesis, this study was based on) were found to initiate move Background information. Further studies are needed to examine other obligatory and optional moves such as Explaining research findings and Indicating research limitations.
Highlights
This paper focuses on move Background information, its linguistic devices such as verb, tense, and self-reference and lexical bundles (LBs) including 3- to 5-word bundles that are used to construct this communicative move
The present study considered the name Background information as named by Dudley-Evans (1994) in his framework who followed the framework from Swales (1990), which was described by Peacock (2002) as “the complete description of moves in the discussion section of research articles” (p. 224)
The findings showed that move Background information occurred in 100% of the corpus and that makes it an obligatory move in the discussion section of applied linguistics research article (RA)
Summary
Ex1: “This study aimed to clarify the clinical features of the..., evaluate the different diagnostic methods, and to evaluate the benefits of...” (Basturkmen, 2012: p. 140). Ex1: “This study aimed to clarify the clinical features of the..., evaluate the different diagnostic methods, and to evaluate the benefits of...” Ex2: “The purpose of this research was to examine the effect of...” The Purpose of This Study Is to: Connecting Lexical Bundles and Moves in Research Article Introductions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.