Abstract
ABSTRACT1. Three ultrasonic machines (Sonatest TE/6, Scanoprobe 731 and Scanogram 721) and the ruler probe were compared as techniques for estimating carcass introscope and caliper measurements of P2 backfat thickness on each of 96 pigs. The effect of operator experience was examined with the Sonatest and Scanoprobe machines. Scanogram measurements of P2 backfat and eye-muscle area were evaluated using two methods of restraint (crate and nose rope).2. The Sonatest was judged to be more precise (increased R2) than the Scanoprobe in predicting P2 backfat depth. Operator experience improved Scanoprobe precision but had little effect with the Sonatest. Ruler probe R2 was intermediate between the Sonatest and Scanoprobe.3. The Scanogram was the most precise live P2 backfat measurement technique. R2 was not affected by method of pig restraint.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
