Abstract

Back analysis for evaluation of the merits of the short-term seismic hazard indicators (precursors) used in the mines and their potential application for early warning was carried out for fourteen seismic events that potentially caused damage in Kiirunavaara Mine, Sweden, selected according to our designed criteria. Five short-term hazard indicators: Seismic Activity Rate (SAR), Cumulative Seismic Moment (CSM), Energy Index (EI), Cumulative Apparent Volume (CAV) and Seismic Apparent Stress Frequency (ASF) were tested. The behaviour of the indicators was studied using the parameters of all seismic events within a sphere around the hypocenter location of the analyzed seismic source within one month before the main (damaging) event. The size of the sphere equals the estimated radius of the analyzed seismic source (area of inelastic deformation). mXrap software (Australian Centre for Geomechanics) was used for data visualization, manipulation, analysis and extraction. The results from the main analysis showed a good agreement between the expected and actual behaviour of the SAR, CSM and CAV indicators. In overall, CSM and CAV ranked the highest positive/expected behaviour followed by SAR (Table 3). The EI and ASF ranked lowest and showed to be sensitive to the number of events within the source sphere. The rate of false warnings and missed warnings was also investigated for the 25 days-long period before the damaging events. A similar trend was observed as for the main analysed event. The results from this study can be used for further improvement of the short-term hazard estimations and early warning system in deep underground mines.

Highlights

  • The current study is a continuation of a previous work, which focused on seismic event source parameter evaluation for the same block at Kiirunavaara mine (Nordstrom et al 2017)

  • Even though a number of parameters have been defined to be indicators of increased seismic hazard in the mines, after a critical review of all parameters for the purpose of this study, we have identified and used five short-term hazard parameters: Activity Rate (SAR), Cumulative Seismic Moment (CSM), Energy Index (EI), Cumulative Apparent Volume (CAV) and Seismic Apparent Stress Frequency (ASF), as they are the most commonly used parameters for estimating seismic hazard and are incorporated in the current seismic database in LKAB mine

  • Used for Seismic Hazard and Selected Hazard Indicators

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current study is a continuation of a previous work, which focused on seismic event source parameter evaluation for the same block at Kiirunavaara mine (Nordstrom et al 2017). Kiirunavaara mine is one of the most modern large sublevel caving iron ore mine located in a north-most small town of Kiruna. About 28 million tonnes of iron ore are produced per annum. The footwall consist of Precambrian aged tracho-andesites referred to as syenite porphyries and the hanging wall consist of quartz (rhyolite) porphyry. Ranking of indicators false and no warning performance for background seismicity Ranking. EI and ASF ranked the lowest (Table 3). For the ‘background events’, we have ranked the performance behavior for false indicators (Table 4). The top three indicators (CAV, SAR, CSM) that ranked the highest with warning performance have the highest rank of false warnings. The indicators that were least reliable for warning (EI) showed the least false warnings (Table 4)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call