Abstract

We apply the general formalism derived in N. Penalva et al. [Phys. Rev. D 101, 113004 (2020)] to the semileptonic decay of pseudoscalar mesons containing a $b$ quark. While present $B\to D^{(*)}$ data give the strongest evidence in favor of lepton flavor universality violation, the observables that are normally considered are not able to distinguish between different new physics (NP) scenarios. In the above reference we discussed the relevant role that the various contributions to the double differential decay widths $d^2\Gamma/(d\omega d\cos\theta_\ell)$ and $d^2\Gamma/(d\omega dE_\ell)$ could play to this end. Here $\omega$ is the product of the two hadron four-velocities, $\theta_\ell$ is the angle made by the final lepton and final hadron three-momenta in the center of mass of the final two-lepton system, and $E_\ell$ is the final charged lepton energy in the laboratory system. The formalism was applied there to the analysis of the $\Lambda_b\to\Lambda_c$ semileptonic decay showing the new observables were able to tell apart different NP scenarios. Here we analyze the $\bar B_c\to \eta_c \tau\bar\nu_\tau$, $\bar B_c\to J/\psi\tau\bar\nu_\tau$, $\bar B\to D\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ and $\bar B\to D^*\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ semileptonic decays. We show that, as a general rule, the $\bar B_c \to J/\psi$ observables, even including $\tau$ polarization, are less optimal for distinguishing between NP scenarios than those obtained from $\bar B_c \to \eta_c$ decays, or those presented in N. Penalva et al. for the related $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c$ semileptonic decay. Finally, we show that $\bar B\to D$ and $\bar B_c\to \eta_c$, and $\bar B\to D^*$ and $\bar B_c\to J/\psi$ decay observables exhibit similar behaviors.

Highlights

  • The present values of the RDðÃÞ ratios (l 1⁄4 e, μ), RD 1⁄4 ΓðB ΓðB → → Dτντ Þ Dlνl Þ Æ 0.013; RDÃΓðB → DÃτντÞ ΓðB → DÃlνlÞ0.008; ð1Þ are the strongest experimental evidence for the possibility of lepton flavor universality violation (LFUV)

  • As a general rule, the Bc → J=ψ observables, even including τ polarization, are less optimal for distinguishing between new physics (NP) scenarios than those obtained from Bc → ηc decays, or those presented by Penalva et al for the related Λb → Λc semileptonic decay

  • We have shown the relevant role that the a0;1;2ðωÞ c.m. and c0;1;2ðωÞ laboratory frame (LAB) scalar functions, in terms of which the c.m. d2Γ=ðdωd cos θlÞ and LAB d2Γ=ðdωdElÞ differential decay widths are expanded, could play in order to separate between different NP scenarios that otherwise give rise to the same RDðÃÞ ; Rηc;J=ψ ratios

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

0.008; ð1Þ are the strongest experimental evidence for the possibility of lepton flavor universality violation (LFUV). With respect to the B → DðÃÞ transitions, we have used the set of form factors and Wilson coefficients found in [31] and, in addition to the c.m. distribution, we present in Sec. III for the first time details of the LAB d2Γ=ðdωElÞ differential decay width and its usefulness to distinguish between different NP scenarios. Very recently the HPQCD collaboration has reported a LQCD determination of the SM vector and axial form factors for the Bc → J=ψ semileptonic decay [62] These LQCD results have been used in Ref. Value, to generate the distribution of each observable, taking into account in this way statistical correlations From this derived distribution, we determine the maximum deviation above and below its central value, the latter obtained with the values of the Wilson coefficients corresponding to the minimum of χ2 and the AL1 form factors. In this case the 1σ uncertainty bands are obtained with the use of the correlation matrix provided in this latter reference

Results with an unpolarized final τ lepton
Results with a polarized final τ lepton
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call