Abstract

We present the first lattice-QCD determination of the form factors describing the semileptonic decays ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{b}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{c}^{*}(2595){\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\ensuremath{-}}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{b}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{c}^{*}(2625){\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\ensuremath{-}}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$, where the ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{c}^{*}(2595)$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{c}^{*}(2625)$ are the lightest charm baryons with ${J}^{P}={\frac{1}{2}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ and ${J}^{P}={\frac{3}{2}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, respectively. These decay modes provide new opportunities to test lepton flavor universality and also play an important role in global analyses of the strong interactions in $b\ensuremath{\rightarrow}c$ semileptonic decays. We determine the full set of vector, axial vector, and tensor form factors for both decays but only in a small kinematic region near the zero-recoil point. The lattice calculation uses three different ensembles of gauge-field configurations with $2+1$ flavors of domain-wall fermions, and we perform extrapolations of the form factors to the continuum limit and physical pion mass. We present Standard Model predictions for the differential decay rates and angular observables. In the kinematic region considered, the differential decay rate for the ${\frac{1}{2}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ final state is found to be approximately 2.5 times larger than the rate for the ${\frac{3}{2}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ final state. We also test the compatibility of our form-factor results with zero-recoil sum rules.

Highlights

  • Semileptonic b → cl−νdecays are used to determine the CKM matrix element Vcb and to search for deviations from lepton flavor universality [1,2,3]

  • We present the first lattice-QCD determination of the form factors describing the semileptonic decays

  • The baryonic decays can provide complementary information on physics beyond the Standard Model when compared with mesonic decays [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Semileptonic b → cl−νdecays are used to determine the CKM matrix element Vcb and to search for deviations from lepton flavor universality [1,2,3]. Note that there is no heavy-quark spin-symmetry relation between the ΛÃc and the Λc due to the different quantum numbers of the light degrees of freedom This difference means that the normalization of the leading Isgur-Wise function for Λb → ΛÃc remains unconstrained in the heavyquark limit, and the matrix elements vanish at zero recoil [32,33]. HQET fits to LHCb data for the muonic decay Λb → ΛÃcμ−νto make Standard Model predictions for RðΛÃcÞ. It is still an open question how well HQET at this order can describe these transitions. IX, and the Appendix contains relations to other form factor definitions used in the literature

DEFINITIONS OF THE FORM FACTORS
LATTICE ACTIONS AND PARAMETERS
TWO-POINT FUNCTIONS AND HADRON MASSES
THREE-POINT FUNCTIONS AND FORM FACTORS
CHIRAL AND CONTINUUM EXTRAPOLATIONS OF THE FORM FACTORS
COMPARISON WITH ZERO-RECOIL SUM RULES
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call