Abstract

Recently, there have been reports of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients presenting with multiple ineffective implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks. In such patients, the placement of an azygous vein coil by providing an alternative anteroposterior trajectory of the electrical shock vector can enable successful defibrillation. This review discusses a hands-on approach to azygous vein coil implantation. Additionally, we compare our tools and technique to those that have been previously described by other operators. From 2018 to 2021, eight patients were identified who underwent azygous vein coil implantation at MedStar Washington Hospital Center using a specific technique and tools. Demographic and procedural data were obtained by a retrospective review of patient charts, procedure logs, fluoroscopy, and venography performed during coil implantation. The indication for azygous vein coil implantation was ineffective ICD shocks in seven patients. The presenting rhythm was ventricular fibrillation in six (75%) cases and sustained ventricular tachycardia in two (25%) cases. Using the approach described, we were able to successfully implant an azygous vein coil in all eight (100%) patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Postimplantation, defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was successfully performed in six of eight (75%) patients. One patient failed DFT testing despite placement of an azygous vein coil. In another patient, DFT testing was not performed because the patient was in atrial fibrillation and was not systemically anticoagulated. In conclusion, the placement of an azygous vein coil in LVAD patients with failed ICD shocks using the tools and technique described in this report is safe and highly efficacious (successful in 100% of cases).

Highlights

  • An elevated defibrillation threshold (DFT) or ineffective shocks are rarely encountered in the contemporary era of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, owing to the effectiveness of modern devices.[1]

  • All study participants suffered from severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and had an left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in place

  • The presenting rhythm was ventricular fibrillation (VF) in six (75%) cases and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in two (25%) cases. Supported by their LVADs, all patients were awake at the time of VT/VF, and the majority of them (n = 5; 62%) experienced more than four consecutive ineffective ICD shocks prior to their presentation (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An elevated defibrillation threshold (DFT) or ineffective shocks are rarely encountered in the contemporary era of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, owing to the effectiveness of modern devices.[1].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call