Axisymmetric gravity currents in a rotating system: experimental and numerical investigations

Abstract

The propagation at high Reynolds number of a heavy, axisymmetric gravity current of given initial volume over a horizontal boundary is considered in both rotating and non-rotating situations. The investigation combines experiments with theoretical predictions by both shallow-water approximations and numerical solutions of the full axisymmetric equations. Attention is focused on cases when the initial ratio of Coriolis to inertia forces is small. The experiments were performed by quickly releasing a known cylindrical volume of dense salt water of 2 m diameter at the centre of a circular tank of diameter 13 m containing fresh ambient water of typical depth 80 cm. The propagation of the current was recorded for different initial values of the salt concentration, the volume of released fluid, the ratio of the initial height of the current to the ambient depth, and the rate of rotation. A major feature of the rotating currents was the attainment of a maximum radius of propagation. Thereafter a contraction–relaxation motion of the body of fluid and a regular series of outwardly propagating pulses was observed. The frequency of these pulses is slightly higher than inertial, and the amplitude is of the order of magnitude of half the maximum radius. Theoretical predictions of the corresponding gravity currents were also obtained by (i) previously developed shallow-water approximations (Ungarish & Huppert 1998) and (ii) a specially developed finite-difference code based on the full axisymmetric Navier–Stokes equations. The ‘numerical experiments’ provided by this code are needed to capture details of the flow field (such as the non-smooth shape of the interface, the vertical dependence of the velocity field) which are not reproduced by the shallow-water model and are very difficult for, or outside the range of, accurate experimental measurement. The comparisons and discussion provide insight into the flow field and indicate the advantages and limitations of the verified simulation tools.