Abstract

While the use of accelerometer derived Player Load has become increasingly prominent, the limitation of this approach is that training load is reduced to a single number with no differentiation between the mechanisms of loading, resulting in a loss of context. As recovery from different loadings occur at different rates, the inability to differentiate between the loading mechanisms could lead to under or over training in one or more of these mechanisms. This study sought to compare axis specific accelerometer derived Player Load with differential RPE scores to establish a means of quantifying the lower limb biomechanical load of adolescent badminton training, to try and understand some of the context into the Player Load number. It was postulated that the Player Load from the vertical axis would provide a more precise measure of lower limb loading as other loading parameters, such as upper body rotation observed during a smash, would be removed from the calculation. Nineteen adolescent badminton players (Age: 14.0 ± 0.8 y) based at a dedicated high performance youth training environment wore a GPS-embedded accelerometer between the scapulae in a purpose built vest during court-based training. After each training session the participants provided two RPE scores, one localised for the legs and one for breathlessness. Overall low correlations were observed between the Player Load and RPE values. The Player Load for the vertical axis showed a stronger correlation with the RPE for breathlessness than the RPE for the lower limb stress. The results from this study suggest that axis specific Player Load from the vertical axis does not provide greater insight into lower-limb biomechanical load compared to overall Player Load in adolescent badminton players.

Highlights

  • Monitoring the loading experienced by an athlete during training or competition is essential for determining whether the athlete is adapting to a training programme, understanding the need for recovery and reducing injury risks (Bourdon et al, 2017)

  • While session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) has been shown to be a valid form of quantifying training load in youth athletes (Haddad et al, 2011; Padulo et al, 2014), it has been observed that youth athletes with greater training experience are able to more accurately perceive exertion compared to youth athletes with less experience (Barroso, Cardoso, Carmo, & Tricolo, 2014)

  • When the participants were split based on chorological age, both the Player Load and the Vertical Load for the younger players was more strongly correlated to the RPE-l score while for older players they were more strongly correlated to the RPE-B score

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monitoring the loading experienced by an athlete during training or competition is essential for determining whether the athlete is adapting to a training programme, understanding the need for recovery and reducing injury risks (Bourdon et al, 2017). The need to manage loading in youth athletes is especially important as there is a growing body of evidence that has demonstrated an increase in overuse injuries amongst youth athletes and has linked inappropriate loads to injury and illness within this population (Murray, 2017) This evidence indicates that when dealing with youth athletes, planning appropriate loads and management of loading patterns is important to support a long sporting career (Bourdon et al, 2017). Catapult Innovations (Melbourne, Australia) developed a modified vector magnitude parameter called “Player Load” by integrating accumulated data from 3 accelerometers within the MinimaxX units (Boyd, Ball, & Aughey, 2011) In this context, Player Load is the summed multidirectional acceleration and deceleration of a player's movements throughout a session. The Player Load calculation has been used in indoor court based sports where the use of GPS is not possible and the cost of local positioning systems (LPS) is prohibitively expensive (Cormack, Smith, Mooney, Yong, & O'Brien, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call