Abstract

To determine whether axial twisting within an ending loop negatively impacts maximum load to failure and failure mode of suture knots. 525 knots (15 samples each of 7 different suture types/sizes tested in 5 knot-twist configurations each). Each suture type (polydioxanone [PDO], Monoderm [polyglecaprone 25], and Nylon) and size (1, 0, 2-0, 3-0) were used to create a starting square knot, and each of the following ending square knot configurations: 0 twists, 1 twist, 4 twists, and 10 twists. Each suture was tested for failure using a universal testing machine (Instron, Instron Corp) with a 100 kg load cell at a speed of 100 mm/min. Each suture and knot was evaluated for a mode of failure using gross evaluation of the knots and video footage recorded during testing. Maximum load at failure (P-value set at .005) and failure mode (p-value set at 0.003) were recorded for each group. Maximum load at failure was decreased in knots tied within ending loops containing more twists for some types and sizes of the suture. With 4 twists, 0-PDO, 1 PDO, and 2-0 Nylon was more likely to fail at the knot than knots with 0 twists. All sutures containing 10 twists, except 3-0 Monoderm, were more likely to fail at the knot than knots with 0 twists. The number of twists within the ending loop may not increase the risk of failure at the knot; however, it can decrease the maximum load to failure at a knot, particularly as the suture size increases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.