Axial rotation analysis in total ankle arthroplasty using weight-bearing computer tomography and three-dimensional modeling

Abstract

BackgroundPost-operative alignment is the most critical indicator for a successful total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Total ankle malrotation is associated with an increased risk for polyethylene wear and medial gutter pain. Currently, there is no consensus on the correct way to measure the alignment of the tibial and talar component rotations in the axial plane. In the current study, the post-operative analysis system was assessed using weight-bearing computer tomography and a three-dimensional (3D) model. The purpose of the study was to assess the inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of this system. Material and methodFour angles were measured by two raters independently in two separate readings: posterior tibial component rotation angle (PTIRA), posterior talar component rotation angle (PTARA), tibia talar component axial angle (TTAM), and tibial component to the second metatarsal angle (TMRA). Agreement analysis was quantified according to the interclass coefficient. ResultsSixty TAAs across 60 patients were evaluated. A good inter-observer agreement and intra-observer agreement when measuring the PTIRA, PTARA, and TTAM angles was observed along with an excellent inter-observer agreement and intra-observer agreement when measuring the TMRA angle. ConclusionIn conclusion, the current 3D model-based measurement system demonstrates good to excellent inter and intra-agreement. According to these results, 3D modelling can be reliably used to measure and assess the axial rotation of TAA components. Level of evidenceLevel 3 retrospective study