Axial Load Capacity Predictions of Drilled Displacement Piles With SPT- and CPT-based Direct Methods

Abstract

Drilled Displacement Piles (DDP) provide an ideal foundation solution that combines the benefits of ground improvement with traditional advantages of piling systems. This paper offers insights gathered from 55 construction projects in which nearly 130 DDPs were installed and tested axially. High quality site exploration data (e.g., Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Standard Penetration Test (SPT)) were evaluated to derive geotechnical analysis parameters. The test sites consisted of mostly mixed soil types with strongly stratified layers of sand, silt, and clay. Pile diameters ranged between 35 and 61 cm (14 to 24 inches). Prior to analyzing the axial performance of DDPs, a variety of failure interpretation methods were assessed to confidently extrapolate failure loads when field testing was terminated prior to pile failure. Results of this study suggested the Van der Veen’s (1953) method to most closely estimate the load that triggers pile plunging behavior specific to DDPs, followed by the Butler & Hoy (1977) and L1-L2 methods (Hirany and Kulhawy, 1989). Hereafter, in-situ axial load test results were compared with a wide range of analytical methods, including those developed specifically for DDPs. Predictive accuracy was assessed in terms of total pile capacity and pile settlement and separated based on pile diameter, stiffness, and soil type. Most examined analytical methods underpredict the in-situ pile capacities for both, CPT and SPT -based analysis. It was also found that the difference between the experimentally determined and predicted capacities is related to the level of improvement in the surrounding soil following pile installation. A general comparison between predictive axial accuracy and the observed level of ground improvement is also discussed for sandy and mixed type of soils.