Abstract

Rubberized concrete (RuC) has emerged as a promising eco-friendly solution for structural elements, offering improved energy dissipation, damping characteristics, and ductility. Incorporating rubber particles into concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns presents an environmentally conscious alternative for various structural applications. However, understanding its performance post-fire is crucial for safe design application, an area currently lacking comprehensive research. This study investigates the structural behavior of sixteen axially loaded circular RuCFST columns after exposure to fire. The columns, with diameters of 219 mm and 377 mm, are filled with normal concrete and RuC, containing 5 %, 15 %, and 30 % replacement of natural fine and coarse aggregate with rubber particles. Following ISO-834 fire standards, the specimens undergo elevated temperatures and subsequent application of compressive axial loads to determine their post-fire behavior. Analysis includes examination of failure modes, temperature-time relationships, axial load-deformation curves, and strain and stress development in the columns. Microstructural analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) is conducted to study internal morphology before and after exposure to high temperatures. Results indicate non-uniform and nonlinear distributions of maximum temperatures across cross-sections, with historical temperature affecting residual capacity more significantly with increased rubber content and decreased column size. Load-bearing capacities decrease by up to 30 % and 22 % for small and large RuCFST columns, respectively, after exposure to fire. Residual axial stiffness also declines, with reductions of nearly 55 % and 42 % for small and large columns, respectively. In contrast, ductility improves in fire-exposed specimens, with columns having a 30 % rubber replacement ratio showing the highest enhancement. A novel method for calculating post-fire residual load capacity based on the average historical maximum temperature is introduced, demonstrating high accuracy and offering a valuable tool for assessing and reinforcing RuCFST columns after fire exposure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.