Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scan has been an increasingly essential diagnostic tool for emergency physicians (EPs) to triage emergency patients. Canadian computed tomography Head Rule (CCHR) had been established and widely used to spare patients with mild head injury from unnecessary radiation. However, the awareness of CCHR and its actual utilization among Chinese EPs were unknown. This survey was to investigate the awareness and use of CCHR and their associated characteristics among Chinese EPs. Questionnaire was randomly sent to EPs from different Chinese hospitals. Surveyed EPs were asked how well they know about the CCHR and how often they use the CCHR to guide head CT use. Association between the awareness and utilization of CCHR and the physicians' characteristics were analyzed using repeated-measures logistic regression. About 41.7% of the total 247 responders noted they "very familiar" or "somewhat familiar" with CCHR while the utilization rate was 24.7%. With respect to the most important underlying barriers for the use of CCHR, approximate half (48.5%) cited "fear of malpractice" as the leading cause. "Received specific training regarding radiation dose of CT" was the significant predicting factor both for the awareness (OR 5.87; 95% CI, 3.08-11.21) and the use (OR 6.10, 95% CI, 2.91-12.80) of CCHR. Fear of malpractice and lack of radiation risk knowledge were two main barriers to apply CCHR in the request of CT for patients with mild head injury. Furthermore, EPs with specific training about radiation risk of CT were more likely to know and use of CCHR.

Highlights

  • “Received specific training regarding radiation dose of Computed tomography (CT)” was the significant predicting factor for both the awareness of Canadian computed tomography Head Rule (CCHR) and the use of CCHR during practice

  • CT is widely accepted as an effective diagnostic modality to detect rare but clinically significant intracranial injuries in patients suffering minor head injury

  • It has been increasingly utilized as a routine test for patients with mild head injury.[1]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Number of CT scans requested by emergency physicians (EPs) is increasing at an astonishing rate.[2,3] yields were extremely low if patients with minor head injury were mandatory to have CT scans without any selection.[4] Given that CT is expensive and has been associated with increased cancer risk due to radiation exposure, there are increasing concerns that the use of head CT for emergency patients with minor head injury should be justified Under this circumstance, the Canadian computed tomography Head Rule (CCHR) was derived in 2001, comprising five high-risk criteria (including GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) score

METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
10. Do you know lifetime risk of cancer believed to be increased by CT scan?
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call