Abstract

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) occurs frequently and requires considerable health care resources. It is important to ensure that the treatments which are provided are both clinically effective and economically justifiable. Based on recent new evidence, routine oxygen therapy is no longer recommended in MI patients without hypoxemia. By using data from a nationwide randomized clinical trial, we estimated oxygen therapy related cost savings in this important clinical setting.Methods: The DETermination of the role of Oxygen in suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction (DETO2X-AMI) trial randomized 6,629 patients from 35 hospitals across Sweden to oxygen at 6 L/min for 6–12 h or ambient air. Costs for drug and medical supplies, and labor were calculated per patient, for the whole study population, and for the total annual care episodes for MI in Sweden (N = 16,100) with 10 million inhabitants.Results: Per patient, costs were estimated to 36 USD, summing up to a total cost of 119,832 USD for the whole study population allocated to oxygen treatment. Applied to the annual care episodes for MI in Sweden, costs sum up to between 514,060 and 604,777 USD. In the trial, 62 (2%) patients assigned to oxygen and 254 (8%) patients assigned to ambient air developed hypoxemia. A threshold analysis suggested that up to a cut-off of 624 USD spent for hypoxemia treatment related costs per patient, avoiding routine oxygen therapy remains cost saving.Conclusions: Avoiding routine oxygen therapy in patients with suspected or confirmed MI without hypoxemia at baseline saves significant expenditure for the health care system both with regards to medical and human resources.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01787110.

Highlights

  • Acute myocardial infarction (MI) occurs annually in approximately 1.5 million cases in the United States and remains one of the leading cause of mortality [1]

  • 5,010 (76%) patients received a primary diagnosis of MI [2,952 (59%) ST-elevation MI (STEMI); 2,058 (41%) NSTEMI] (Figure 1)

  • 316 patients (5%) received supplemental oxygen outside the protocol due to the development of hypoxemia, including 62 (2%) patients assigned to oxygen and 254 (8%) patients assigned to ambient air (P < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) occurs annually in approximately 1.5 million cases in the United States and remains one of the leading cause of mortality [1]. As MI occurs both frequently and requires considerable health care resources, it is important to assure that the treatments which are provided are both clinically effective, and economically justifiable. The recent randomized Determination of the role of Oxygen in suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction (DETO2X-AMI) [5] trial demonstrated definitive evidence that routine oxygen therapy provided no benefit regarding patient-reported [6] and clinical outcomes [7–11] to patients with suspected MI without hypoxemia at baseline which led to changes in guidelines [12– 15] and clinical practice. By using unique data from a nationwide randomized clinical trial, we performed a study to estimate oxygen therapy related costs (i) on patient level, (ii) on study level, and (iii) projected on the whole annual Swedish MI population to assess potential cost-savings in this important clinical setting. By using data from a nationwide randomized clinical trial, we estimated oxygen therapy related cost savings in this important clinical setting

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call