Abstract
At probable cause hearings in cases involving the civil commitment of a person as a sexually violent predator (SVP), judges consider evidence, likely including one or more reports from an evaluating psychologist or psychiatrist. At least in Florida, judges rely on the evaluators' reports as accurate sources for the person's criminal history, including his history of sex-offense convictions. But the evaluators' reports are not consistently accurate regarding criminal history, and no one in the process is demanding accuracy or questioning the “facts” included in the reports. Recommendations are made for evaluators, state programs, attorneys for respondents, state attorneys, and judges.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
