Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to avoid staging lymphadenectomies by detecting nodal metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC).MethodsA single institutional retrospective study was performed including all patients with intermediate- and high-risk EC who underwent surgical nodal staging between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients with disseminated disease detected on imaging techniques or at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients were evaluable if they underwent nodal staging with SLNB and pelvic (PLD) and paraaortic (PALD) lymph node dissection. We analyzed the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node technique. Only patients with at least one sentinel lymph node (SLN) detected were included in the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) analyses. The tracers used were technetium 99m, blue dye, and indocyanine green.ResultsEighty-eight patients presented intermediate- and high-risk EC (51 patients and 37 patients respectively) and underwent SLNB with consecutive PLD and PALD. The median (range) number of sentinel nodes retrieved was 2.9 (0–11). The global detection rate of SLN was 96.6% with a bilateral detection of 80.7% when considering all tracers used. However, when combination of indocyanine green and technetium was used the bilateral detection rate was 90.3%. Nodal metastases were detected in 17 (19.3%) cases, 8 (47%) of them corresponded to low volume metastasis (LVM), 7 (87.5%) of them diagnosed at ultrastaging pathologic exam. Finally, we obtained a sensitivity of 90%, a NPV of 97.5%, and a false negative rate (FNR) of 10% in the intermediate-risk EC compared to sensitivity of 85.7%, NPV of 96.6%, and FNR of 14.3% in the high-risk EC group. The only patient with isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis was found at the high-risk group, 1.1%.ConclusionsAccording to our results, full lymphadenectomy could be avoided by performing SLNB in patients with intermediate-risk EC because the only false negative case detected was at the beginning of ICG learning curve. For high-risk EC patients we did not find enough evidence to support the systematic avoidance of staging full lymph node dissection. Nevertheless, SLNB should be performed in all cases of EC as it improves LVM diagnosis substantially.

Highlights

  • Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with an estimated incidence of 65,620 new cases in 2020, causing 12,590 deaths annually in the USA

  • Several clinical trials as SENTI-ENDO or FIRES [6, 7], showed that SLN biopsy seems to be as accurate as systematic lymphadenectomy to evaluate the nodal status of early-stage EC reporting a high sensitivity and negative predictive value to detect nodal involvement (84 and 97% vs 97.2 and 99.6%, respectively [6,7,8]

  • On final pathology 69 patients (78.4%%) presented early stage and advanced stage was presented in 19 patients (21.6%%) being the most frequent histology endometrioid, 61 patients (69.3%%), and serous, 15 cases (17%), adenocarcinoma (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with an estimated incidence of 65,620 new cases in 2020, causing 12,590 deaths annually in the USA. Several clinical trials as SENTI-ENDO or FIRES [6, 7], showed that SLN biopsy seems to be as accurate as systematic lymphadenectomy to evaluate the nodal status of early-stage EC reporting a high sensitivity and negative predictive value to detect nodal involvement These studies included mostly no high-risk disease for lymph node involvement which could influence the false negative rate

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call