Abstract

Females increase their risk of mating with heterospecifics when they prefer the traits of conspecifics that overlap with traits found in heterospecifics. Xiphophorus pygmaeus females have a strong preference for larger males, which could lead to females preferring to mate with heterospecific males; almost all sympatric X. cortezi males are larger than X. pygmaeus males. In this study, we show that X. pygmaeus females preferred the chemical cues from conspecifics over those of X. cortezi males. However, preference for the chemical cues of conspecifics could not reverse the preference for larger heterospecific males. Only when females were presented with two species-specific cues (vertical bars and chemical cues) did more females spend more time on average with the smaller conspecific males. These results support the backup signal hypothesis for the evolution of multiple preferences; together, the two species-specific cues increased the accuracy with which females were able to avoid heterospecific males. In addition, the results suggest that in those situations in which the traits of conspecifics overlap with traits found in heterospecifics, females can use the assessment of multiple cues to avoid mating with heterospecifics without compromising their preference for the highest-quality conspecific. Copyright 2003.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.