Abstract

Our study showed that one species of water strider (Aquarius najas) dominated the insect fauna (>90% of the biomass) on and near the surface of a small stream in southern Sweden, but the diet of Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii), regularly feeding over the same stream, contained <1% of these insects. To explain why the bats did not eat water striders in proportion to the apparent abundance of these insects, we tested three hypotheses, with the following results: (1) The water striders did not respond to artificial bat calls and therefore their defence against bats is not based on ultrasonic hearing. (2) Water striders hand-fed to the bats were eaten with similar frequency as palatable controls (caddis flies), so there is no evidence that water striders are unpalatable to bats. (3) Attempted prey-captures by the bats occurred less often than expected within 1 m of the bank of the stream (the bank consisted of a stone wall), indicating that the bats' flight or, alternatively, their detection or capture of insects, was difficult within that area, possibly constrained by clutter. At dusk and just before the bats emerged to feed, the water striders moved away from the open water. They remained motionless close to the bank for as long as the bats were active.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call