AVO polarization and hodograms: AVO strength and polarization product

Abstract

An alternative approach to identifying amplitude‐variation‐with offset (AVO) anomalies is to consider the AVO polarization in the AVO intercept–AVO gradient (A‐B) plane. This method does not require deviations or separations from a background trend exhibited in traditional crossplots such as intercept‐gradient (A‐B) or near trace–far trace (N‐F). A benefit of the hodogram or polarization method is that the wavelet is taken into consideration. Crossplotted intercept and gradient are polarized along a “background trend” for nonanomalous events and at angles different from the “background trend” for anomalous events. This allows recognition of anomalous behavior otherwise buried in a background.Attributes resulting from this methodology include (1) the polarization angle, (2) the polarization angle difference, (3) the AVO strength, (4) the polarization product, and (5) the linear‐correlation coefficient. These different attributes can then be used to enhance AVO interpretation. Synthetic modeling for a succession of gas and brine layers encased in shale units indicates that the method can potentially be an effective hydrocarbon indicator. Application of the method to a real seismic dataset shows polarization anomalies associated with hydrocarbons.