Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on the response of white voters to African American candidates has produced decidedly mixed results. I argue that methodological limitations are a major source of this perplexing array of findings and that a field experiment may help shed more light on the topic than is possible in laboratory experiments, surveys, or in post-election data analysis. Here, a field experiment embedded in two low salience school board elections in Columbus, Ohio produced a striking pattern consistent with the thrust of aversive racism research. To wit, simply being sent a mailing showing the race of a white or African American candidate had little effect on white voters. However, after being sent a mailing showing a candidate’s race and negative information about the candidate, white voters punished African American candidates more severely than white candidates with the same record. In short, people seemed to cast race-based votes only in circumstances in which they could deny race was a factor in their decision.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call