Avatar Design in Education: Realistic vs. Cartoonish Representation and Acceptability

Abstract

This paper examines the variations in attitudes towards avatars across different age groups. The study reveals that middle-aged individuals prioritize the economic advantages of avatars but express dissatisfaction with their lack of authenticity and emotional communication capabilities. In contrast, the younger generation gravitates towards interacting with real people as they offer a more genuine and personalized communication experience. Real individuals can convey information through facial expressions, voice, and body language, meeting the youth's desire for effective and sensory communication. Furthermore, real people can adapt and respond flexibly to user feedback and contextual cues, aligning with the youth's expectations for customization and individuality. Opinions within the teenage group differ, with some acknowledging the potential of avatars to provide a wealth of knowledge and customization. They appreciate the ability to tailor the avatar's characteristics and services to their specific needs. Conversely, another portion of the teenage group perceives avatars as lacking authenticity and the ability to share personal experiences. They value the human element in communication and find avatars unable to replicate the depth of emotional connection that real individuals offer. Overall, the attitudes towards avatars among different age groups are influenced by various factors such as economic considerations, human nature, sensory experiences, and effectiveness. These differences reflect the diverse needs and values of each age group. Understanding these nuanced perspectives can inform the design and implementation of avatar technologies to better cater to the expectations and preferences of different age demographics.