Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to identify, by means of thromboelastometry assessment, altered thrombotic risk in dogs with primary and secondary IMHA by E. canis infection after initiating the immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil. The animals’ screening was based on complete blood count (CBC), biochemical and urine tests. Dogs with moderate to severe anemia (hematocrit ≤ 25%) which showed symptoms of immune-mediated hemolysis, such as spherocytosis, positive saline agglutination, bilirubinuria and/or hemoglobinuria, were included. Blood and urine samples were collected at two different moments. The first sample (M1) was collected at the time of diagnosis, when hematocrit was lower or equal to 25% before treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (Accord ®); the second sample (M2) was collected after treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, when hematocrit was greater or equal to 30%. Five out of the twelve animals selected died before the end of the study. No reduction in thrombotic risk was observed in the animals treated with mycophenolate mofetil. The animals that presented hypocoagulation at the time of diagnosis showed the worst prognosis, and their reticulocyte count displayed a better prognostic value than their erythrocytes count at the time of diagnosis.

Highlights

  • Immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is the most prevalent immune disorder in dogs

  • This study aimed to identify, by means of thromboelastometry assessment, altered thrombotic risk in dogs with primary and secondary IMHA by E. canis infection after initiating the immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil

  • Two females were diagnosed with primary IMHA and three with IMHA secondary to ehrlichiosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is the most prevalent immune disorder in dogs. This condition is characterized by type II hypersensitivity and lead to premature destruction of erythrocytes (Balch and Mackin, 2007; McAless, 2010). Primary IMHA cannot be associated with an obvious predisposition. It is breed related, so it is an exclusion diagnosis. Secondary IMHA is related to several agents, and the ehrlichiosis stands out among the infectious ones (Giger, 2005; Balch and Mackin, 2007). Its treatment commonly involves immune response suppression by means of glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil (Giger, 2005; Wang et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.