Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatment methods on glass-fiber posts relative to their bond strength with the composite resin and to evaluate the types of failures that occurred. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six posts from WhitepostDC (FG group) and Exacto Conics (AG group) were used, divided into: Control FG-1 and AG-1 groups – application of silane, according to manufacturers’ specifications; FG-2 and AG-2 groups – conditioning with 10% hydrogen peroxide and silanization; FG-3 and AG-3 groups – aluminum oxide blasting for 10 seconds and silaniza-tion. The composite resin was added in 2-mm increments, each increment was photopolymerized for 40 seconds, until the entire length of the matrix was filled. Then, the assembly (fiber post and composite resin) was sectioned into three portions (cervical, middle and apical) (n = 18). Samples were submitted to the bond strength analysis by a push-out test in a Universal Testing Machine and the failure types were evaluated with a 30 × magnification with an optical micro-scope. Data were submitted to the analysis of variance, the Tukey test, and the chi-square test with a 5% significance level. Results: For AG groups, the treatment with silane (23.10 MPa) resulted in statistically greater bond strength than the treatments with peroxide (17.19 MPa) and blasting (16.28 MPa). It was found that the bond strength was statistically higher in the middle third (21.16 MPa) than in the apical third (12.55 MPa) for the peroxide treatment. The mixed-type failure had the highest prevalence (57.01%). Conclusion: Silane treatment showed statistically greater bond strength values, when the Angelus brand was tested.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatment methods on glass-fiber posts

  • aluminum oxide blasting for 10 seconds and silanization

  • The composite resin was added in 2-mm increments

Read more

Summary

Materiais e métodos

Foram utilizados 36 pinos de fibra de vidro, divididos em WhitepostDC (FGM, Joinville, SC, Brasil) (grupo GF, comprimento de 20 mm) e Exacto Cônicos (Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brasil) (grupo GA, comprimento de 17 mm), íntegros, com dupla conicidade e superfície lisa. Os pinos foram adaptados ao centro da matriz metálica com o auxílio de uma pinça, sendo utilizada cera utilidade (Lysanda, São Paulo, SP, Brasil) para garantir maior estabilização. Para a realização da análise da resistência de união, a amostra de cada grupo (n = 18) foi submetida ao teste Push-Out em uma Máquina de Ensaio Universal (EMIC, São José dos Pinhais, PR, Brasil). A análise do tipo de falha foi realizada com o uso de um microscópio óptico com aumento 30 × (Maquira, Maringá, PR, Brasil), sendo as falhas distribuídas em: coesivas do pino (falha localizada dentro da estrutura do pino), coesivas da resina (falha localizada dentro da estrutura da resina composta), adesiva (falhas na interface entre pino e resina composta) ou mistas (quando mais de um tipo de falha pode ser visualizada em uma mesma amostra) (Figura 4). Tabela 1: Análise de variância três fatores para resistência de união da resina composta aos pinos avaliados

Graus de liberdade
Terço Apical
Coesiva do Pino
Terço Apical Médio Cervical
Conflito de interesses
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call