Abstract

Introduction: Pressure ulcer cushions are specialised devices for pressure redistribution and management of tissue load and microclimate. They should maintain postural alignment, facilitate movement, create a stable base, relieve pain and be comfortable. They can be composed exclusively of one material such as foam, gel, air and fluid, or a combination of two or more of these materials. Research has focused on weight distribution and has neglected the dynamic behaviour of the cushion during everyday activities. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness in maintaining dynamic balance of three types of medium-high range cushions with different compositions. Material and Methods: Study with a female person with Girdle-Limb Muscular Dystrophy, using: a foam and air cushion (A), a foam and fluid bag cushion (B) and an air cushion (C). Data were collected in two moments: 1) anthropometric, kinematic and dynamic data collection, through direct measurement of reach, video recording and accelerometer, and pressures exerted on the cushions, employing a protocol of movements and cushion randomisation; 2) evaluation of user perception with a questionnaire and visual analogue pain scale, after four hours of staying on the cushion. Results: Cushion A revealed better results at the level of maximum reach, peak pressure in the initial position, coefficient of variation and mean pressure in frontal trunk flexion. Cushion B showed more positive results in the contact area, coefficient of variation and mean pressure in the initial position, peak pressure in frontal trunk flexion, acceleration variation and subjective analysis. Conclusion: The anti-sores cushions that combine two materials in their composition are more effective in promoting dynamic balance, with the advantage of the cushion composed of foam and fluid.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call