Abstract

An assessment of the performance of various parameterization alternatives for roughness lengths of momentum and water vapour was performed. The micrometereological data used in this work was measured in the Itaipu reservoir, Brazil. Four models was tested for momentum roughness length, and four for water vapour. The parameterization for horizontal momentum flux are based on the Charnock equation and generalizations while the water vapour model are based on equations proposed by Brutsaert. The four models for momentum flux produced very similar results, in terms of goodness of fit and errors, and turned out only weakly dependent on friction velocity. Already the parameterizations for water vapor produced more dispersed results, and the best parameterizations found very poorly depend on the Reynolds roughness number, or are independent of it. Both in the case of momentum and water vapour, the optimal parameter values? of each parameterization found for Itaipu are significantly larger than those reported in the literature.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.