Avaliação da acuidade visual em crianças com hidrocefalia : um estudo eletrofisiológico por potencial visual evocado de varredura

Abstract

Pereira SA. Visual acuity evaluation in children with hydrocephalus: an electrophysiological study with sweep visual evoked potential. The objective was to measure the visual acuity (VA) of children with the diagnosis of hydrocephalus with or without peritoneal-ventricular shunt (PVS). A total of 55 children with the diagnosis of hydrocephalus (45 with PVS and 10 without PVS) were included in the study (34F and 21M), with an age range of 0 to 291 weeks (mean=74 weeks). The VA was measured by the sweep visual evoked potential technique and the results were compared with reference values proposed by Norcia (1985b). Etiological diagnosis of the hydrocephalus was as follows: intracranial hemorrhage (25 children), meningomyelocele (20 children) and congenital hydrocephalus (10 children). The diagnosis of hydrocephalus was made in an average time of 16 days of life. After the diagnosis, the insertion of the PVS, when made, was accomplished in average on the 16 day. Of those with a PVS, in 31 the ventricular valve was inserted before 15 days after the diagnosis whereas in 14 in shunt was inserted after 15 days. Of the 55 children evaluated in the first exam, 18 were evaluated in a second exam, 13 did the third exam, 10 completed 4 exams and only 5 completed the 5 evaluations. The results of the 101 sweep visual evoked potential performed in all children, 95 exams (94%) were abnormal and only 6 were normal. There was no statistical difference in the VA of children without a ventricular shunt in comparison with those in which the shunt was inserted after 15 days of the diagnosis of hydrocephalus (p=0.699). There was, however, a statistical difference in the VA between children with a ventricular shunt inserted before 15 days of the diagnosis and children with a ventricular shunt after 15 days (p=0.038) or those without a shunt (p=0.031). Children with no complications of the ventricular shunt had a better VA as compared to those with shunt complications (p= 0.0001). In the group of children with complications, again those who had a shunt inserted before 15 days bad better VA results in comparison to those in whom the shunt was inserted after 15days (p=0.029). We concluded that measuring visual acuity by sweep visual evoked potential is feasible in children with the diagnosis of hydrocephalus and that results are usually worse comparing with reference values. The timing for insertion of a ventricular shunt and the occurrence of complications of this procedure are factors that may influence the VA. To our knowledge, this is the first study that progressively evaluated the VA in children, of early age, with hydrocephalus, with or without a ventricular shunt and correlated the VA with the timing and complications of the ventricular shunt. Despite the great technological advance in ophthalmology, we are still unable to prevent visual impairments, detectable by simple visual acuity tests, in children with hydrocephalus. The timing of the insertion of the ventricular shunt and the adequate treatment of the potential complications may be delayed due to prematurity, hemodynamic instability and family refusal. This delay may compromise the visual development of these children.