Abstract

BackgroundWe assessed the impact of home-based care (HBC) for HIV+ patients, comparing outcomes between two groups of Zambians receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) who lived in villages with and without HBC teams.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical charts from Macha Mission Hospital, a hospital providing HIV care in Zambia's rural Southern Province. Date of birth, date of ART initiation, place of residence, sex, body mass index (BMI), CD4+ cell count, and hemoglobin (Hgb) were abstracted. Logistic regression was used to test our hypothesis that HBC was associated with treatment outcomes.ResultsOf 655 patients, 523 (80%) were eligible and included in the study. There were 428 patients (82%) with favorable outcomes (alive and on ART) and 95 patients (18%) with unfavorable outcomes (died, lost to follow-up, or stopped treatment). A minority of the 523 eligible patients (n = 84, 16%) lived in villages with HBC available. Living in a village with HBC was not significantly associated with treatment outcomes; 80% of patients in a village with HBC had favorable outcomes, compared to 82% of patients in a village without HBC (P = 0.6 by χ2). In bivariable analysis, lower BMI (P<0.001), low CD4+ cell count (P = 0.02), low Hgb concentration (P = 0.02), and older age at ART initiation (P = 0.047) were associated with unfavorable outcomes. In multivariable analysis, low BMI remained associated with unfavorable outcomes (P<0.001).ConclusionsWe did not find that living in a village with HBC available was associated with improved treatment outcomes. We speculate that the ART clinic's rigorous treatment preparation before ART initiation and continuous adherence counseling during ART create a motivated group of patients whose outcomes did not improve with additional HBC support. An alternative explanation is that the quality of the HBC program is suboptimal.

Highlights

  • Home-based care (HBC) is used as an adjunct to or replacement for traditional clinic-based HIV care programs, especially where public health services are strained [1,2,3,4,5]

  • home-based care (HBC) has been associated with better antiretroviral therapy (ART) outcomes in Malawi and South Africa [2,6], increased ART adherence [3,7], and decreased stigma [8]

  • Subject Characteristics and Disposition We reviewed the charts of 655 patients; 132 patients were excluded (20.2%), and 523 patients were included (79.9%) as per our study design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Home-based care (HBC) is used as an adjunct to or replacement for traditional clinic-based HIV care programs, especially where public health services are strained [1,2,3,4,5]. HBC has been associated with better antiretroviral therapy (ART) outcomes in Malawi and South Africa [2,6], increased ART adherence [3,7], and decreased stigma [8]. Tempering these promising results is a body of data regarding the limited effectiveness of some HBC programs [1]. We assessed the impact of home-based care (HBC) for HIV+ patients, comparing outcomes between two groups of Zambians receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) who lived in villages with and without HBC teams. We sought to evaluate the impact of one such program in rural Zambia by comparing outcomes of patients living in villages served by a HBC group with outcomes of patients living in villages not served by a HBC group

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call