Abstract

BackgroundTo improve the quality of plan for the radiation treatment of advanced left breast cancer by introducing the auxiliary structures (ASs) which are used to spare the regions with no intact delineated structures adjacent to the target volume.MethodsCT data from 20 patients with left-sided advanced breast cancer were selected. An AS designated as A1 was created to spare the regions of the aorta, pulmonary artery, superior vena ava, and contralateral tissue of the upper chest and neck, and another, designated as A2, was created in the regions of the cardia and fundus of the stomach, left liver lobe, and splenic flexure of the colon. IMRT and VMAT plans were created for cases with and without the use of the AS dose constraints in plan optimization. Dosimetric parameters of the target and organs at risk (OARs) were compared between the separated groups.ResultsWith the use of AS dose constraints, both the IMRT and VMAT plans were clinically acceptable and deliverable, even showing a slight improvement in dose distribution of both the target and OARs compared with the AS-unused plans. The ASs significantly realized the dose sparing for the regions and brought a better conformity index (p < 0.05) and homogeneity index (p < 0.05) in VMAT plans. In addition, the volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20) for the heart (p < 0.05), V40 for the left lung (p < 0.05), and V40 for the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel juncture region (p < 0.05) were all lower in VMAT plans.ConclusionThe use of the defined AS dose constraints in plan optimization was effective in sparing the indicated regions, improving the target dose distribution, and sparing OARs for advanced left breast cancer radiotherapy, especially those that utilize VMAT plans.

Highlights

  • Female breast cancer has become the most common cancer worldwide in 2020, as estimated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [1]

  • The clinical target volume (CTV), which is consisted of the chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular area, was delineated on planning CT scan by a specialized radiation oncologist, following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recommendations published in the RTOG breast contouring atlas

  • The use of A1 (Dmax < 20 Gy) and A2 (Dmax < 30 Gy) in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan optimization successfully constricted the extension of intermediate-high doses in the adjacent region of the target

Read more

Summary

Methods

CT data from 20 patients with left-sided advanced breast cancer were selected. An AS designated as A1 was created to spare the regions of the aorta, pulmonary artery, superior vena ava, and contralateral tissue of the upper chest and neck, and another, designated as A2, was created in the regions of the cardia and fundus of the stomach, left liver lobe, and splenic flexure of the colon. IMRT and VMAT plans were created for cases with and without the use of the AS dose constraints in plan optimization. Dosimetric parameters of the target and organs at risk (OARs) were compared between the separated groups

Results
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
Dosimetric Results of OARs
Dosimetric Results of PTV
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call