Abstract

BackgroundAutosomal dominant GCH1 mutations are known to cause dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD). In this case series, we confirm a variant phenotype, characterized by predominant spastic paraplegia at disease onset with development of dystonia and/or parkinsonism only decades later. MethodsClinical trajectories of four patients from three families with pathogenic variants in GCH1 are described, illustrated by videos of the motor phenotype before and during treatment with levodopa. An extensive literature review was performed on previous reports of spasticity in patients with autosomal dominant GCH1 mutations. ResultsAll patients presented during childhood or early adolescence with gait and leg spasticity. Three patients developed basal ganglia signs only in the fifth decade; the youngest patient has not yet developed dystonia, bradykinesia or hypokinesia. All patients responded to levodopa/carbidopa with improvement of gait and of dystonia, hypokinesia and/or rigidity. In all patients, spasticity decreased but did not disappear. Spasticity has been described previously in DRD, but in most cases co-existent basal ganglia signs were identified early in the disease course. ConclusionGCH1 mutations may cause a phenotype initially resembling hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) rather than DRD, with basal ganglia signs developing only after decades. In order not to miss this treatable condition, GCH1 should be included in HSP gene panels and its testing is pivotal in patients with spastic paraplegia, especially if there are concomitant basal ganglia signs and/or diurnal fluctuation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.