Abstract

Previous behavioral studies have shown that individuals with autism are less hindered by interference from global processing during the performance of lower-level perceptual tasks, such as finding embedded figures. The primary goal of this study was to examine the brain manifestation of such atypicality in high-functioning autism using fMRI. Fifteen participants with high-functioning autism and fifteen age- and IQ-matched typical controls were asked to perform a lower-level perceptual line-counting task in the presence of a distracting depiction of a 3-D object, in which participants counted whether there were more red or more green contours (In a contrasting 3-D task, participants judged whether the same 3-D stimulus objects (but without color in any contours) depicted a possible or impossible 3-D object). We hypothesized that individuals with autism would be less likely than controls to process the global 3-D information (and would hence show fewer neural signs of such interfering 3-D processing) during the lower-level line-counting task. The fMRI results revealed that in the line-counting task, the autism group did not show the increased medial frontal activity (relative to the possibility task), or the increased functional connectivity between the medial frontal region and posterior visual–spatial regions, demonstrated by the control group. Both findings are indices of lesser effort and difficulty in the line-counting task for the autism group than for the control group, attributed to less interference from the 3-D processing in the autism group. In addition, in the line-counting task, the control group showed a positive correlation between a measure of spatial ability (Vandenberg scores) and activation in the medial frontal region, suggesting that more spatially able control participants did more suppression of the irrelevant 3-D background information in order to focus on the line-counting task. The findings collectively indicate that the global 3-D structure of the figure had a smaller effect, if any, on local processing in the group with autism compared to the control group. The results from this study provide the first direct neural evidence of reduced global-to-local interference in autism.

Highlights

  • Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by core deficits in communication and social cognition, in the presence of repetitive behavior and limited imagination (APA, 1994)

  • Analyses of the percent signal change (PSC) in the medial frontal regions of interest (ROIs) revealed an interaction between group and task (F (1, 28) = 4.47, p < 0.05)

  • Control participants had a reliably greater mean PSC in the medial frontal ROI in the count task than in the possibility task (mean = 0.20; t (14) = 3.47, p < 0.01); but there was no such difference in the autism group (count: mean = 0.23; possibility: mean = 0.22; t (14) = 0.41, p > 0.10)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by core deficits in communication and social cognition, in the presence of repetitive behavior and limited imagination (APA, 1994). Participants with autism can better detect hidden figures than normal controls (Jolliffe & Baron-Cohen, 1997) and show enhanced detection of a local target in a visual search task (O’Riordan, Plaisted, Driver, & Baron-Cohen, 2001; Plaisted, O’Riordan, & Baron-Cohen, 1998). In face processing, they focus on individual face features rather than the configuration (Hubl et al, 2003; Joseph & Tanaka, 2003). While the EPF theory suggests that individuals with autism are capable of global processing when it is called for, the WCC theory is indecisive of the impairment of the global processing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.