Abstract
Abstract The paper examines the way in which Castoriadis’s political positions on autonomy and heteronomy relate to his philosophical analysis of the alienation of society from its institutions and the attribution of the origin of its laws to an extra-social source. In this context, autonomy is closely related to the possibility of reflexivity, construed as a critical interrogation of the meaning and content of institutions and laws, which allows to bring to the fore the socially created character of each institution, and, therefore, the possibility of its deliberate and collective change. However, the fact that something is a social product does not automatically entail that it can be modified at will. It is against this background that this piece raises some questions about autonomy and heteronomy in the modern world and explores possible limitations of Castoriadian reflexivity, while attempting to seek answers to these questions through Castoriadis’s work.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.