Abstract
An autonomous endocardial and epicardial boundary detection (ABD) method is reported. One hundred ten cycles from 55 clinical studies were selected retrospectively. Image sequences were digitized at 512 × 480 pixel resolution. The point-by-point boundary positions of the ABD and the areas enclosed were compared with positions and enclosed areas drawn by three independent observers. Correlation coefficients for epicardial end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) areas, endocardial ED and ES areas, muscle area, and fractional area change were 0.970, 0.976, 0.951, 0.985, 0.887, and 0.878, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed negligible biases with standard deviations comparable to those of the observers. The mean difference between the ABD border and the consensus observer border positions in 64 directions falls within the mean range of interobserver border positions, suggesting that shape is also well defined by the ABD. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11:338-48.)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
