Abstract
How do cells perceive time? Do cells use temporal information to regulate the production/degradation of their enzymes, membranes, and organelles? Does controlling biological time influence cytoskeletal organization and cellular architecture in ways that confer evolutionary and physiological advantages? Potential answers to these fundamental questions of cell biology have historically revolved around the discussion of ‘master’ temporal programs, such as the principal cyclin-dependent kinase/cyclin cell division oscillator and the circadian clock. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent evidence supporting an emerging concept of ‘autonomous clocks,’ which under normal conditions can be entrained by the cell cycle and/or the circadian clock to run at their pace, but can also run independently to serve their functions if/when these major temporal programs are halted/abrupted. We begin the discussion by introducing recent developments in the study of such clocks and their roles at different scales and complexities. We then use current advances to elucidate the logic and molecular architecture of temporal networks that comprise autonomous clocks, providing important clues as to how these clocks may have evolved to run independently and, sometimes at the cost of redundancy, have strongly coupled to run under the full command of the cell cycle and/or the circadian clock. Next, we review a list of important recent findings that have shed new light onto potential hallmarks of autonomous clocks, suggestive of prospective theoretical and experimental approaches to further accelerate their discovery. Finally, we discuss their roles in health and disease, as well as possible therapeutic opportunities that targeting the autonomous clocks may offer.
Highlights
We present this important concept at different scales and complexities, and postulate original insights, for the regulation of cell cycle, and for broader aspects of biological time control
This study finds a strong correlation between the variant phenotypes and KaiC ATP-a se activity to explain the vast period differences, what still remains inconclusive is whether this residue somehow directly influences the ATP-a se activity via an allosteric mechanism at the interface of two KaiC hexamers or indirectly by disrupting the formation of KaiC dodecamers, perturbing the clock synchronization
A brief comparison in the number of circadian regulated transcripts between land and sea species illustrates the strength of circadian phase-locking in the former: while almost 50% of all mouse genes show circadian expression in at least one organ (Zhang et al, 2014b), this fraction is only 10% in Bathymodiolus azoricus in situ in deep sea (Mat et al, 2020)
Summary
Did different cellular events evolve to control time with their autonomous clocks and become progressively coupled to a common cell cycle?. Was the primitive version of eukaryotic cell cycle a network of roughly coupled autonomous clocks? Did the CCO evolve to become a master regulator for this network?. Are autonomous clocks just an intermediate form of cellular timing in evolution? Are they employed actively, even in species where the CCO or the circadian clock imposes a strong degree of phase-locking?. Did autonomous clocks require extrinsic cues during their evolution (e.g., light, feeding, ionic fluxes, etc.)?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.