Abstract

BackgroundAsthma is a major chronic disease that poses a heavy burden on health care. To facilitate the allocation of care management resources aimed at improving outcomes for high-risk patients with asthma, we recently built a machine learning model to predict asthma hospital visits in the subsequent year in patients with asthma. Our model is more accurate than previous models. However, like most machine learning models, it offers no explanation of its prediction results. This creates a barrier for use in care management, where interpretability is desired.ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a method to automatically explain the prediction results of the model and recommend tailored interventions without lowering the performance measures of the model.MethodsOur data were imbalanced, with only a small portion of data instances linking to future asthma hospital visits. To handle imbalanced data, we extended our previous method of automatically offering rule-formed explanations for the prediction results of any machine learning model on tabular data without lowering the model’s performance measures. In a secondary analysis of the 334,564 data instances from Intermountain Healthcare between 2005 and 2018 used to form our model, we employed the extended method to automatically explain the prediction results of our model and recommend tailored interventions. The patient cohort consisted of all patients with asthma who received care at Intermountain Healthcare between 2005 and 2018, and resided in Utah or Idaho as recorded at the visit.ResultsOur method explained the prediction results for 89.7% (391/436) of the patients with asthma who, per our model’s correct prediction, were likely to incur asthma hospital visits in the subsequent year.ConclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate the feasibility of automatically offering rule-formed explanations for the prediction results of any machine learning model on imbalanced tabular data without lowering the performance measures of the model. After further improvement, our asthma outcome prediction model coupled with the automatic explanation function could be used by clinicians to guide the allocation of limited asthma care management resources and the identification of appropriate interventions.

Highlights

  • Between 2005 and 2016, 3.59% (11,332/315,308) of data instances were related to asthma hospital visits in the subsequent year

  • We showed that this method explained the prediction results for 89.7% (391/436) of the patients with asthma whom our extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model correctly predicted to incur asthma hospital visits in the subsequent year

  • After further improvement of its accuracy, our asthma outcome prediction model coupled with the automatic explanation function could be used for decision support to guide the allocation of limited asthma care management resources

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As employed by health plans in 9 of 12 metropolitan communities [3] and by health care systems such as Intermountain Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente Northern California [4], and the University of Washington Medicine, the state-of-the-art method for achieving this goal is to employ a predictive model to predict which patients with asthma are highly likely to have poor outcomes in the future. Once identified, such patients are enrolled in care management. By offering such tailored preventive care properly, up to 40% of future hospital visits by patients with asthma can be avoided [5,6,7,8]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call