Abstract

The well-testing analysis is performed in two consecutive steps including identification of underlying reservoir models and estimation of model-related parameters. The non-uniqueness problem always brings about confusion in selecting the correct reservoir model using the conventional interpretation approaches. Many researchers have recommended artificial intelligence techniques to automate the well-testing analysis in recent years. The purpose of this article is to apply an artificial neural network (ANN) methodology to identify the well-testing interpretation model and estimate the model-related variables from the pressure derivative plots. Different types of ANNs including multi-layer perceptrons, probabilistic neural networks and generalized regression neural networks are used in this article. The best structure and parameters of each neural network is found via grid search and cross-validation techniques. The experimental design is also employed to select the most governing variables in designing well tests of different reservoir models. Seven real buildup tests are used to validate the proposed approach. The presented ANN-based approach shows promising results both in recognizing the reservoir models and estimating the model-related parameters. The experimental design employed in this study guarantees the comprehensiveness of the training data sets generated for learning the proposed ANNs using fewer numbers of experiments compared to the previous studies.

Highlights

  • The well-testing provides the required data for the qualitative and quantitative characterization of the reservoir

  • While multi-layer perceptron (MLP) networks are suggested for estimating the permeability and skin factor values from the pressure derivative plots in this article, they are not recommended for estimating the values of wellbore storage coefficient, storativity ratio, and inter-porosity flow coefficient and for classifying the correct reservoir models using the pressure derivative data, due to relatively large mean squared error (MSE) values of the MLP networks when modeling these parameters for the reservoir models considered in this article (‘‘Results and discussions’’ section)

  • This article does not consider the well-testing analysis of more complex models using the presented approach that could be the subjects of future studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The well-testing provides the required data for the qualitative and quantitative characterization of the reservoir. These data exhibit the real behavior of fluid flow throughout the reservoir as well as the near-wellbore region. The interpretation of pressure transient data has two main objectives: (1) diagnosing the underlying conceptual reservoir model, and (2) estimating the model-related parameters. The use of expert systems and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques has been investigated by many authors in recent years to automate the process of recognizing the conceptual reservoir models and eliminate the existing problems in conventional analysis methods. Many approaches investigate the well-testing model identification using the AI techniques, whereas a few techniques have been developed to estimate the model-related parameters

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call