Automatic seismic shock generator

Abstract

To assess the stability of clinicians' and users' rating of electric-powered wheelchair (EPW) driving while using 4 different human-machine interfaces (HMIs) within the Virtual Reality–based SIMulator–version 2 (VRSIM-2) and in the real world (accounting for a total of 5 unique driving conditions).Within-subjects repeated-measures design.Simulation-based assessment in a research laboratory.A convenience sample of EPW athletes (N=21) recruited at the 31st National Veterans Wheelchair Games.Not applicable.Composite PMRT scores from the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT); Raw Task Load Index; and the 6 subscale scores from the Task Load Index developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA-TLX).There was moderate stability (intraclass correlation coefficient between .50 and .75) in the total composite PMRT scores (P<.001) and the users' self-reported performance scores (P<.001) among the 5 driving conditions. There was a significant difference in the workload among the 5 different driving conditions as reflected by the Raw Task Load Index (P=.009). Subanalyses revealed this difference was due to the difference in the mental demand (P=.007) and frustration (P=.007) subscales. Post hoc analyses revealed that these differences in the NASA-TLX subscale scores were due to the differences between real-world and virtual driving scores, particularly attributable to the conditions (1 and 3) that lacked the rollers as a part of the simulation.Further design improvements in the simulator to increase immersion experienced by the EPW user, along with a standardized training program for clinicians to deliver PMRT in VRSIM-2, could improve the stability between the different HMIs and real-world driving.