Abstract

While fish use continuous and flexible bodies to propel themselves, fish robots are often made from interconnected segments. How many segments do robots need to represent fish movements accurately? We propose a new method to automatically determine parsimonious robot models from actual fish data. We first identify key bending points (i.e., joint positions) along the body and then study the concerted movement of the segments so that the difference between actual fish and modelled bending kinematics is minimized. To demonstrate the utility of our method, we analyse the steady swimming kinematics of 10 morphologically distinct fish species. Broadly classified as sub-carangiform (e.g., rainbow trout) and carangiform (e.g., crevalle jack) swimmers, these species exhibit variations in the way they undulate when traditional parameters (including head and tail beat amplitudes, body wavelength and maximum curvature along the body) are considered. We show that five segments are sufficient to describe the kinematics with at least 99% accuracy. For optimal performance, segments should progressively get shorter towards the tail. We also show that locations where bending moments are applied vary among species, possibly because of differences in morphology. More specifically, we find that wider fish have shorter head segments. We discover that once bending points are factored in, the kinematics differences observed in these species collapse into a single undulatory pattern. The amplitude and timing of how body segments move entirely depend on their respective joint positions along the body. Head and body segments are also coupled in a timely manner, which depends on the position of the most anterior joint. Our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how morphology relates to kinematics and highlight the importance of head control, which is often overlooked in current robot designs.

Highlights

  • In contrast to man-made propellers, most fish produce thrust by undulating their axial bodies (Bainbridge 1963)

  • Our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how morphology relates to kinematics and highlight the importance of head control, which is often overlooked in current robot designs

  • Body design is a research area that can benefit from a formalized approach while drawing inspiration from biology. This is of particular significance to address questions like: how do we partition the body and where do we place actuation points so that the movements of a robot resemble those of the fish that it is designed after? What is the most parsimonious robot design that can describe the movements of the fish accurately?

Read more

Summary

20 May 2021

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, SY23 3FL, United Kingdom ∗ Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed. Keywords: fish robots, undulatory kinematics, multi-segment model, carangiform swimmers, steady swimming

Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.