Automatic Scoring Model of Subjective Questions Based Text Similarity Fusion Model

Abstract

AbstractAI In this era, scene based translation and intelligent word segmentation are not new technologies. However, there is still no good solution for long and complex Chinese semantic analysis. The subjective question scoring still relies on the teacher's manual marking. However, there are a large number of examinations, and the manual marking work is huge. At present, the labor cost is getting higher and higher, the traditional manual marking method can't meet the demand The demand for automatic marking is increasingly strong in modern society. At present, the automatic marking technology of objective questions has been very mature and widely used. However, by reasons of the complexity and the difficulty of natural language processing technology in Chinese text, there are still many shortcomings in subjective questions marking, such as not considering the impact of semantics, word order and other issues on scoring accuracy. The automatic scoring technology of subjective questions is a complex technology, involving pattern recognition, machine learning, natural language processing and other technologies. Good results have been seen in the calculation method-based deep learning and machine learning. The rapid development of NLP technology has brought a new breakthrough for subjective question scoring. We integrate two deep learning models based on the Siamese Network through bagging to ensure the accuracy of the results, the text similarity matching model based on the birth networks and the score point recognition model based on the named entity recognition method respectively. Combining with the framework of deep learning, we use the simulated manual scoring method to extract and match the score point sequence of students’ answers with standard answers. The score recognition model effectively improves the efficiency of model calculation and long text keyword matching. The loss value of the final training score recognition model is about 0.9, and the accuracy is 80.54%. The accuracy of the training text similarity matching model is 86.99%, and the fusion model is single. The scoring time is less than 0.8s, and the accuracy is 83.43%.