Automatic quantification of right ventricular function with gated blood pool SPECT

Abstract

Background Quantification of right ventricular (RV) function is clinically relevant for the risk stratification and follow-up of patients with a wide spectrum of disease. This can be achieved with electrocardiography-gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (GBPS). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the completely automatic QBS GBPS processing software as compared with equilibrium planar radionuclide angiography (RNA) and with a GBPS manual segmentation method (GBPS 35%) for the measurement of global RV ejection fraction (EF), taking the first-pass RNA (FP-RNA) as the gold standard. In parallel, we compared the RVEF, RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), and RV end-systolic volume (ESV) provided by QBS and GBPS 35%. Methods and results The population included 85 patients with chronic post-embolic pulmonary hypertension. Twenty-one patients were excluded because of unsuccessful FP-RNA. Intraobserver and interobserver RVEF, RVEDV, and RVESV reproducibilities encountered with planar RNA, QBS, and GBPS 35% were similar and compared favorably with those calculated with FP-RNA for RVEF. Mean RVEF was different between all methods. RVEF calculated with FP-RNA was better correlated to QBS ( r = 0.68) and GBPS 35% ( r = 0.70) than to planar RNA ( r = 0.59). RVEDV and RVESV with QBS were lower than with GBPS 35%, by 29% ± 14% and 36% ± 13%, respectively. RVEDV and RVESV with QBS were highly correlated to corresponding GBPS 35% values: r = 0.88 and r = 0.91, respectively. Conclusion As opposed to FP-RNA, GBPS is highly successful for the quantification of RV function. Both QBS and GBPS 35% provide RVEF values similarly well correlated to FP-RNA and performed better than planar RNA. RVEF, RVEDV, and RVESV provided by QBS and GBPS 35% are highly correlated. All of these RV functional measurements require further validation versus a better gold standard before their accuracy can be established.