Abstract

Engines are verified through production tests before delivering them to customers. During those tests, lot of measures are taken on different parts of the engine, considering multiple physical parameters. Unexpected measures can be observed. For this very reason, it is important to assess if these unusual observations are statistically significant.
 However, anomaly detection is a difficult problem in unsupervised learning. The obvious reason is that, unlike supervised classification, there is no ground truth against which we could evaluate results. Therefore, we propose a methodology based on two independent statistical algorithms to double check our results. One approach is the Isolation Forest (IF) model which is specific to anomaly detection and able to handle a large number of variables. The goal of the algorithm is to find rare items, events or observations which raise suspicions by differing significantly from the majority of the data and, at the same time, it discriminates non-informative variables to improve. One main issue of IF is its lack of interpretability. Within this scope, we extend the shapley values, interpretation indicators, to the unsupervised context to interpret the model outputs.
 The second approach is the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) model which has nice properties for data mining by providing both clustering and visual representation. The performance of the method and its interpretability depends on the chosen subset of variables. In this respect, we first implement a sparse-weighted K-means to reduce the input space, allowing the SOM to give an interpretable discretized representation.
 We apply the two methodologies on data on aircraft engines measurements. Both approaches show similar results which are easily interpretable and exploitable by the experts.

Highlights

  • As an aircraft engines manufacturer, Safran verifies all individual engines before delivering to the customer during production tests

  • The production tests that verify essential engine functions before delivering it to an airline company are done in different bench test cells, under different ambient conditions, etc

  • It provides a nice interpretation of the effect of each variable on the anomaly score

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

As an aircraft engines manufacturer, Safran verifies all individual engines before delivering to the customer during production tests Those bench test operations generate lots of measures for different parts of the engines, resulting in multiple physical parameters acquisitions. A thermodynamic model is applied to compensate for context variations but there still exist some second level residuals we may have to compensate to enhance the quality of the measurements They essentially depend on test bench components like slave cowls, and sites and suppliers. A stabilized point, is a fixed level of performance for which all engines are tested and measurements acquired. Normalizing variables successively by each test bench component is an acceptable method only if test bench components are independent with each others In this case we found out, using a pairwise ttest, that this type of normalization does not remove the bias in the data. It is preferred to keep the non-standardized data and to include the bench components to our models, which will be able to handle interactions between variables

EXPERT KNOWLEDGE TO DEFINE ANOMALIES
RESULTS
ANOMALY CATEGORIZATION USING SELFORGANIZING MAP
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.