Abstract

Signature-based intrusion detection systems provide solutions to counter the increasing number of attacks on network resources. But this is not helpful for novel attacks whose signatures aren't available. Automated signature generation systems can work proactively to detect these attacks in real time and generate signatures of new attacks. This article analyzes the latest developments, including Honeycyber, Hancock, Arbor, Auto-Sign, Argos, Hamsa, F-Sign, and a hybrid honeyfarm-based defense system, comparing these systems on the basis of their ability to detect novel attacks, signature generation method, suitability for multiple instances of worms, type of signature generated, attacks and worms covered, false alarm rates, and relative strengths and weaknesses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.