Abstract
Accurate assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity is critical in clinical diagnosis and treatment. No single echocardiographic method has been recommended for MR quantification thus far. We sought to define the feasibility and accuracy of the mask regions with a convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) algorithm in the automatic qualitative evaluation of MR using color Doppler echocardiography images. The authors collected 1132 cases of MR from hospital A and 295 cases of MR from hospital B and divided them into the following four types according to the 2017 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines: grade I (mild), grade II (moderate), grade III (moderate), and grade IV (severe). Both grade II and grade III are moderate. After image marking with the LabelMe software, a method using the Mask R-CNN algorithm based on deep learning (DL) was used to evaluate MR severity. We used the data from hospital A to build the artificial intelligence (AI) model and conduct internal verification, and we used the data from hospital B for external verification. According to severity, the accuracy of classification was 0.90, 0.89, and 0.91 for mild, moderate, and severe MR, respectively. The Macro F1 and Micro F1 coefficients were 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. According to grading, the accuracy of classification was 0.90, 0.87, 0.81, and 0.91 for grade I, grade II, grade III, and grade IV, respectively. The Macro F1 and Micro F1 coefficients were 0.89 and 0.89, respectively. Automatic assessment of MR severity is feasible with the Mask R-CNN algorithm and color Doppler electrocardiography images collected in accordance with the 2017 ASE guidelines, and the model demonstrates reasonable performance and provides reliable qualitative results for MR severity.
Highlights
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart condition
We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of MR severity detection with artificial intelligence (AI) data models using MR color Doppler echocardiography images collected based on the 2017 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines
Many recent studies have shown that 2D technology is not the most accurate method for quantitatively evaluating MR, the 2D Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) technique is currently the most commonly used method for quantitatively evaluating MR compared with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and the 3D TTE technique [10]
Summary
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular heart condition. A study by the 2016 American Heart Association (AHA) in the USA estimated that the incidence rate of moderate or worse MR is 1.7%, which is approximately 4-fold higher than that of aortic stenosis [1]. The incidence increases with age, and the proportion can reach 10%. In the population over 75 years old [2]. The therapeutic method varies based on the degree of MR. According to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database, the number of mitral valve surgeries increased by an average of 4% every year between 2010 and 2015. When deciding which patients are suitable for mitral valve (MV) surgery, the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and AHA for the management of valvular heart
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.