Abstract

Abstract. In this paper, we present a proposition of a fully automatic classification of VHR satellite images. Unlike the most widespread approaches: supervised classification, which requires prior defining of class signatures, or unsupervised classification, which must be followed by an interpretation of its results, the proposed method requires no human intervention except for the setting of the initial parameters. The presented approach bases on both spectral and textural analysis of the image and consists of 3 steps. The first step, the analysis of spectral data, relies on NDVI values. Its purpose is to distinguish between basic classes, such as water, vegetation and non-vegetation, which all differ significantly spectrally, thus they can be easily extracted basing on spectral analysis. The second step relies on granulometric maps. These are the product of local granulometric analysis of an image and present information on the texture of each pixel neighbourhood, depending on the texture grain. The purpose of texture analysis is to distinguish between different classes, spectrally similar, but yet of different texture, e.g. bare soil from a built-up area, or low vegetation from a wooded area. Due to the use of granulometric analysis, based on mathematical morphology opening and closing, the results are resistant to the border effect (qualifying borders of objects in an image as spaces of high texture), which affect other methods of texture analysis like GLCM statistics or fractal analysis. Therefore, the effectiveness of the analysis is relatively high. Several indices based on values of different granulometric maps have been developed to simplify the extraction of classes of different texture. The third and final step of the process relies on a vegetation index, based on near infrared and blue bands. Its purpose is to correct partially misclassified pixels. All the indices used in the classification model developed relate to reflectance values, so the preliminary step of recalculation of pixel DNs to reflectance is required. Thanks to this, the proposed approach is in theory universal, and might be applied to different satellite system images of different acquisition dates. The test data consists of 3 Pleiades images captured on different dates. Research allowed to determine optimal indices values. Using the same parameters, we obtained a very good accuracy of extraction of 5 land cover/use classes: water, low vegetation, bare soil, wooded area and built-up area in all the test images (kappa from 87% to 96%). What constitutes important, even significant changes in parameter values, did not cause a significant declination of classification accuracy, which demonstrates how robust the proposed method is.

Highlights

  • The most popular satellite image classification approaches are not fully automatic

  • We present a proposition of a maximized automatic classification of VHR satellite images irrespective of time and of the conditions of image acquisition

  • Unlike the most widespread approaches, the proposed method requires no human intervention, except the setting of the initial parameters. It can be achieved by the use of indices – including some well known ones, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (Rouse, 1974), or others, developed for this method: the index based on the result of granulometric analysis of the texture of an image (Kupidura, 2015) – allowing to separate, distinctly, different land cover classes in regard to their spectral or textural characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regardless of the specific method of classification: spectral, contextual or object-based, the intervention of a human operator is required at some stage of the process, either in the preliminary stage – defining class signatures in the supervised approach (and defining the segmentation process in object-based classification), or in the final stage – in the interpretation of results in the unsupervised approach. This intervention is very often required due to the different conditions of the images which are classified (e.g. different terrain illumination conditions, or a different growing season, and differences in scanner calibration). It can be achieved by the use of indices – including some well known ones, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (Rouse, 1974), or others, developed for this method: the index based on the result of granulometric analysis of the texture of an image (Kupidura, 2015) – allowing to separate, distinctly, different land cover classes in regard to their spectral or textural characteristics

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call