Abstract

Recent years have seen neuroimaging data sets becoming richer, with larger cohorts of participants, a greater variety of acquisition techniques, and increasingly complex analyses. These advances have made data analysis pipelines complicated to set up and run (increasing the risk of human error) and time consuming to execute (restricting what analyses are attempted). Here we present an open-source framework, automatic analysis (aa), to address these concerns. Human efficiency is increased by making code modular and reusable, and managing its execution with a processing engine that tracks what has been completed and what needs to be (re)done. Analysis is accelerated by optional parallel processing of independent tasks on cluster or cloud computing resources. A pipeline comprises a series of modules that each perform a specific task. The processing engine keeps track of the data, calculating a map of upstream and downstream dependencies for each module. Existing modules are available for many analysis tasks, such as SPM-based fMRI preprocessing, individual and group level statistics, voxel-based morphometry, tractography, and multi-voxel pattern analyses (MVPA). However, aa also allows for full customization, and encourages efficient management of code: new modules may be written with only a small code overhead. aa has been used by more than 50 researchers in hundreds of neuroimaging studies comprising thousands of subjects. It has been found to be robust, fast, and efficient, for simple-single subject studies up to multimodal pipelines on hundreds of subjects. It is attractive to both novice and experienced users. aa can reduce the amount of time neuroimaging laboratories spend performing analyses and reduce errors, expanding the range of scientific questions it is practical to address.

Highlights

  • Rhodri Cusack 1*, Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky 2, Daniel J

  • Existing modules are available for many analysis tasks, such as SPM-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) preprocessing, individual and group level statistics, voxel-based morphometry, tractography, and multi-voxel pattern analyses (MVPA)

  • Aa allows for full customization, and encourages efficient management of code: new modules may be written with only a small code overhead. aa has been used by more than 50 researchers in hundreds of neuroimaging studies comprising thousands of subjects

Read more

Summary

Automatic analysis

2009; Kundu et al, 2012; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslcourse/ graduate/icaprac/artdata/dim33.ica/report; http://fsl.fmrib.ox. ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FIX), modeling of noise components (Kay et al, 2013), and image rejection (Power et al, 2012). In addition to the sheer number of useful analysis methods available, many methods are highly computationally intensive, such as searchlight MVPA (Kriegeskorte et al, 2006), probabilistic tractography, and highdimensional image warping (Ashburner, 2007). Implementing these complementary approaches commonly requires a combination of software packages, which follow diverse concepts and may even use different file formats. Not discussed in this manuscript, it includes growing support for other modalities including MEG, EEG, and ECoG

DESIGN GOALS
LIMITATIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.