Automated Supra- and Infratentorial Brain Infarct Volume Estimation on Diffusion Weighted Imaging Using the RAPID Software.

Abstract

PurposeThe present computerized techniques have limits to estimate the ischemic lesion volume especially in vertebrobasilar ischemia (VBI) automatically. We investigated the ability of the RAPID AI (RAPID) software on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to estimate the infarct size in VBI in comparison to supratentorial ischemia (STI).MethodsAmong 123 stroke patients (39 women, 84 men, mean age 66 ± 11 years) having undergone DWI, 41 had had a VBI and 82 a STI. The infarct volume calculation by RAPID was compared to volume calculations by 2 neurologists using the ABC/2 method. For inter-reader and between-method analysis intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), area under the curve (AUC) estimations, and Bland–Altman plots were used.ResultsICC between the two neurologists and each neurologist and RAPID were >0.946 (largest 95% CI boundaries 0.917–0.988) in the STI group, and > 0.757 (95% CI boundaries between 0.544 and 0.982) in the VBI group. In the STI group, AUC values ranged between 0.982 and 0.999 (95% CI 0.971–1) between the 2 neurologists and between 0.875 and 1 (95% CI 0.787–1) between the neurologists and RAPID; in the VBI group, they ranged between 0.925 and 0.965 (95% CI 0.801–1) between the neurologists, and between 0.788 and 0.931 (95% CI 0.663–1) between RAPID and the neurologists. Compared to the visual DWI interpretation by the neurologists, RAPID did not recognize a substantial number of infarct volumes of ≤ 2 ml.ConclusionThe ability of the RAPID software to depict strokes in the vertebrobasilar artery system seems close to its ability in the supratentorial brain tissue. However, small lesion volumes ≤ 2 ml remain still undetected in both brain areas.