Abstract
Skull stripping is an initial and critical step in the pipeline of mouse fMRI analysis. Manual labeling of the brain usually suffers from intra- and inter-rater variability and is highly time-consuming. Hence, an automatic and efficient skull-stripping method is in high demand for mouse fMRI studies. In this study, we investigated a 3D U-Net based method for automatic brain extraction in mouse fMRI studies. Two U-Net models were separately trained on T2-weighted anatomical images and T2*-weighted functional images. The trained models were tested on both interior and exterior datasets. The 3D U-Net models yielded a higher accuracy in brain extraction from both T2-weighted images (Dice > 0.984, Jaccard index > 0.968 and Hausdorff distance < 7.7) and T2*-weighted images (Dice > 0.964, Jaccard index > 0.931 and Hausdorff distance < 3.3), compared with the two widely used mouse skull-stripping methods (RATS and SHERM). The resting-state fMRI results using automatic segmentation with the 3D U-Net models are highly consistent with those obtained by manual segmentation for both the seed-based and group independent component analysis. These results demonstrate that the 3D U-Net based method can replace manual brain extraction in mouse fMRI analysis.
Highlights
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (D’Esposito et al, 1998; Lee et al, 2013) has been widely employed in neuroscience research
The brain mask predicted by SHERM and Rapid Automatic Tissue Segmentation (RATS) misaligned with the ground truth at the sharp-angled corner while the 3D U-Net model still performed well in these locations
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the feasibility of 3D U-Net for mouse skull stripping from brain functional (T2∗w) images and the impact of automatic skull stripping on the final Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis
Summary
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (D’Esposito et al, 1998; Lee et al, 2013) has been widely employed in neuroscience research. In mouse fMRI research, structural and functional images are commonly acquired with T2-weighted (T2w). In the practice of mouse fMRI analysis, skull stripping is usually performed by manually labeling each MRI volume slice-by-slice, due to the absence of a reliable automatic segmentation method. This manual brain extraction is extremely time-consuming, as a large number of slices need to be processed in the fMRI analysis for each mouse. A fully automatic, rapid, and robust skull-stripping method for both T2w and T2∗w images is highly desirable in mouse fMRI studies
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.