Abstract

Skull stripping is an initial and critical step in the pipeline of mouse fMRI analysis. Manual labeling of the brain usually suffers from intra- and inter-rater variability and is highly time-consuming. Hence, an automatic and efficient skull-stripping method is in high demand for mouse fMRI studies. In this study, we investigated a 3D U-Net based method for automatic brain extraction in mouse fMRI studies. Two U-Net models were separately trained on T2-weighted anatomical images and T2*-weighted functional images. The trained models were tested on both interior and exterior datasets. The 3D U-Net models yielded a higher accuracy in brain extraction from both T2-weighted images (Dice > 0.984, Jaccard index > 0.968 and Hausdorff distance < 7.7) and T2*-weighted images (Dice > 0.964, Jaccard index > 0.931 and Hausdorff distance < 3.3), compared with the two widely used mouse skull-stripping methods (RATS and SHERM). The resting-state fMRI results using automatic segmentation with the 3D U-Net models are highly consistent with those obtained by manual segmentation for both the seed-based and group independent component analysis. These results demonstrate that the 3D U-Net based method can replace manual brain extraction in mouse fMRI analysis.

Highlights

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (D’Esposito et al, 1998; Lee et al, 2013) has been widely employed in neuroscience research

  • The brain mask predicted by SHERM and Rapid Automatic Tissue Segmentation (RATS) misaligned with the ground truth at the sharp-angled corner while the 3D U-Net model still performed well in these locations

  • To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the feasibility of 3D U-Net for mouse skull stripping from brain functional (T2∗w) images and the impact of automatic skull stripping on the final Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (D’Esposito et al, 1998; Lee et al, 2013) has been widely employed in neuroscience research. In mouse fMRI research, structural and functional images are commonly acquired with T2-weighted (T2w). In the practice of mouse fMRI analysis, skull stripping is usually performed by manually labeling each MRI volume slice-by-slice, due to the absence of a reliable automatic segmentation method. This manual brain extraction is extremely time-consuming, as a large number of slices need to be processed in the fMRI analysis for each mouse. A fully automatic, rapid, and robust skull-stripping method for both T2w and T2∗w images is highly desirable in mouse fMRI studies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call