Abstract

Giant kelp populations that support productive and diverse coastal ecosystems at temperate and subpolar latitudes of both hemispheres are vulnerable to changing climate conditions as well as direct human impacts. Observations of giant kelp forests are spatially and temporally uneven, with disproportionate coverage in the northern hemisphere, despite the size and comparable density of southern hemisphere kelp forests. Satellite imagery enables the mapping of existing and historical giant kelp populations in understudied regions, but automating the detection of giant kelp using satellite imagery requires approaches that are robust to the optical complexity of the shallow, nearshore environment. We present and compare two approaches for automating the detection of giant kelp in satellite datasets: one based on crowd sourcing of satellite imagery classifications and another based on a decision tree paired with a spectral unmixing algorithm (automated using Google Earth Engine). Both approaches are applied to satellite imagery (Landsat) of the Falkland Islands or Islas Malvinas (FLK), an archipelago in the southern Atlantic Ocean that supports expansive giant kelp ecosystems. The performance of each method is evaluated by comparing the automated classifications with a subset of expert-annotated imagery (8 images spanning the majority of our continuous timeseries, cumulatively covering over 2,700 km of coastline, and including all relevant sensors). Using the remote sensing approaches evaluated herein, we present the first continuous timeseries of giant kelp observations in the FLK region using Landsat imagery spanning over three decades. We do not detect evidence of long-term change in the FLK region, although we observe a recent decline in total canopy area from 2017–2021. Using a nitrate model based on nearby ocean state measurements obtained from ships and incorporating satellite sea surface temperature products, we find that the area of giant kelp forests in the FLK region is positively correlated with the nitrate content observed during the prior year. Our results indicate that giant kelp classifications using citizen science are approximately consistent with classifications based on a state-of-the-art automated spectral approach. Despite differences in accuracy and sensitivity, both approaches find high interannual variability that impedes the detection of potential long-term changes in giant kelp canopy area, although recent canopy area declines are notable and should continue to be monitored carefully.

Highlights

  • Kelp forests make up an important coastal habitat that provides productive and dynamic biotic structure, supports diverse marine ecosystems and fisheries, and supplies resources to coastal communities [1, 2]

  • We compared automated and citizen science approaches for estimating giant kelp canopy coverage and evaluated the performance of each method for the Falkland Islands or Islas Malvinas (FLK) region based on validation using our full subset of manually classified images

  • We developed kelp canopy time series for the FLK region and tested for associations between giant kelp area and environmental parameters or climate indices using the best performing approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kelp forests make up an important coastal habitat that provides productive and dynamic biotic structure, supports diverse marine ecosystems and fisheries, and supplies resources to coastal communities [1, 2]. These coastal ecosystems are extensive across temperate to subpolar latitudes of both hemispheres. The sensitivity of giant kelp to environmental drivers leads to high variability in kelp forest abundance across a variety of space and time scales [6]. This sensitivity makes kelp ecosystems especially vulnerable to changes in environmental conditions. Regular monitoring is required to detect potential changes in the distribution of giant kelp corresponding with environmental changes, and long-term data sets are needed to separate trends from natural background variability [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call