Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of a 3D camera for body contour detection in pediatric patient positioning in CT compared with routine manual positioning by radiographers.Methods and materialsOne hundred and ninety-one patients, with and without fixation aid, which underwent CT of the head, thorax, and/or abdomen on a scanner with manual table height selection and with table height suggestion by a 3D camera were retrospectively included. The ideal table height was defined as the position at which the scanner isocenter coincides with the patient’s isocenter. Table heights suggested by the camera and selected by the radiographer were compared with the ideal height.ResultsFor pediatric patients without fixation aid like a baby cradle or vacuum cushion and positioned by radiographers, the median (interquartile range) absolute table height deviation in mm was 10.2 (16.8) for abdomen, 16.4 (16.6) for head, 4.1 (5.1) for thorax-abdomen, and 9.7 (9.7) for thorax CT scans. The deviation was less for the 3D camera: 3.1 (4.7) for abdomen, 3.9 (6.3) for head, 2.2 (4.3) for thorax-abdomen, and 4.8 (6.7) for thorax CT scans (p < 0.05 for all body parts combined).ConclusionA 3D camera for body contour detection allows for automated and more accurate pediatric patient positioning than manual positioning done by radiographers, resulting in overall significantly smaller deviations from the ideal table height. The 3D camera may be also useful in the positioning of patients with fixation aid; however, evaluation of possible improvements in positioning accuracy was limited by the small sample size.Key Points• A 3D camera for body contour detection allows for automated and accurate pediatric patient positioning in CT.• A 3D camera outperformed radiographers in positioning pediatric patients without a fixation aid in CT.• Positioning of pediatric patients with fixation aid was feasible using the 3D camera, but no definite conclusions were drawn regarding the positioning accuracy due to the small sample size.

Highlights

  • Technological developments in computed tomography (CT) enhanced the clinical imaging possibilities in pediatric patients, sparking off a growth in the number of CT scans performed within this population [1, 2]

  • We assessed the accuracy of pediatric patient positioning with the aid of a body contour detection system (3D camera) and compared it with manual positioning by radiographers

  • We found that positioning with the 3D camera of pediatric patients without a fixation aid allows for more accurate patient positioning than manual positioning by radiographers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Technological developments in computed tomography (CT) enhanced the clinical imaging possibilities in pediatric patients, sparking off a growth in the number of CT scans performed within this population [1, 2]. Considerable efforts have been made to optimize radiation dose and image quality (IQ) [3, 4]. Several techniques are used to optimize pediatric CT scanning protocols such as automated tube current and tube voltage adaptation, as well as the use of iterative reconstruction techniques [5,6,7,8]. For an ideal working of the automatic exposure control (AEC) and to achieve ideal IQ, it is important to position the patient exactly in the center of the CT gantry [9].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call