Abstract

Abstract. Geological uncertainty quantification is critical to subsurface modeling and prediction, such as groundwater, oil or gas, and geothermal resources, and needs to be continuously updated with new data. We provide an automated method for uncertainty quantification and the updating of geological models using borehole data for subsurface developments within a Bayesian framework. Our methodologies are developed with the Bayesian evidential learning protocol for uncertainty quantification. Under such a framework, newly acquired borehole data directly and jointly update geological models (structure, lithology, petrophysics, and fluids), globally and spatially, without time-consuming model rebuilding. To address the above matters, an ensemble of prior geological models is first constructed by Monte Carlo simulation from prior distribution. Once the prior model is tested by means of a falsification process, a sequential direct forecasting is designed to perform the joint uncertainty quantification. The direct forecasting is a statistical learning method that learns from a series of bijective operations to establish “Bayes–linear-Gauss” statistical relationships between model and data variables. Such statistical relationships, once conditioned to actual borehole measurements, allow for fast-computation posterior geological models. The proposed framework is completely automated in an open-source project. We demonstrate its application by applying it to a generic gas reservoir dataset. The posterior results show significant uncertainty reduction in both spatial geological model and gas volume prediction and cannot be falsified by new borehole observations. Furthermore, our automated framework completes the entire uncertainty quantification process efficiently for such large models.

Highlights

  • Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is at the heart of decision making

  • Geological models are constructed for appraisal and uncertainty quantification, such as estimating water volumes stored in groundwater systems or heat storage in a geothermal system

  • We establish the geological uncertainty quantification framework based on Bayesian evidential learning (BEL), which is briefly reviewed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is at the heart of decision making This is true in subsurface applications such as groundwater, geothermal resources, fossil fuels, CO2 sequestration, or minerals resources. Geological models are constructed for appraisal and uncertainty quantification, such as estimating water volumes stored in groundwater systems or heat storage in a geothermal system. Realistic geological modeling involves complex procedures (Caumon, 2010, 2018; de la Varga et al, 2019). This is due to the hierarchical nature of geological formations: fluids are contained in a porous medium, the porous medium is defined by various lithologies, and lithological variation is contained in faults and layers (structure). Boreholes are not drilled all at once but throughout the lifetime of managing the Earth’s resource

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call