Abstract

The academic and behavioral progress of children is associated with the timely development of reading and writing skills. Dysgraphia, characterized as a handwriting learning disability, is usually associated with dyslexia, developmental coordination disorder (dyspraxia), or attention deficit disorder, which are all neuro-developmental disorders. Dysgraphia can seriously impair children in their everyday life and require therapeutic care. Early detection of handwriting difficulties is, therefore, of great importance in pediatrics. Since the beginning of the 20th century, numerous handwriting scales have been developed to assess the quality of handwriting. However, these tests usually involve an expert investigating visually sentences written by a subject on paper, and, therefore, they are subjective, expensive, and scale poorly. Moreover, they ignore potentially important characteristics of motor control such as writing dynamics, pen pressure, or pen tilt. However, with the increasing availability of digital tablets, features to measure these ignored characteristics are now potentially available at scale and very low cost. In this work, we developed a diagnostic tool requiring only a commodity tablet. To this end, we modeled data of 298 children, including 56 with dysgraphia. Children performed the BHK test on a digital tablet covered with a sheet of paper. We extracted 53 handwriting features describing various aspects of handwriting, and used the Random Forest classifier to diagnose dysgraphia. Our method achieved 96.6% sensibility and 99.2% specificity. Given the intra-rater and inter-rater levels of agreement in the BHK test, our technique has comparable accuracy for experts and can be deployed directly as a diagnostics tool.

Highlights

  • Our database is not balanced in terms of positive and negative examples (242 Typically Developing (TD) children versus 56 D children), which can skew the model towards a larger subpopulation

  • Automated human-level diagnosis of dysgraphia using a consumery T Asselborn et al Due to the differences between positive examples means less statistical significance), our model still and negative examples in the database, manages to extract relevant information from the features reporting the overall accuracy might be misleading. This is an indirect benefit compared to the BHK test, always predicts non-dysgraphia will be ~75% accurate)

  • Robustness of the test To validate the robustness of the test, we measured how much data per user was needed in order to accurately predict dysgraphia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Between 5 and 34% of children never master handwriting.[11,12] With the rising cognitive demand of school work as they progress through school, these children quickly face more general difficulties As they encounter trouble automatizing their handwriting, they cannot handle simultaneous tasks, such as grammar, spelling, and composition. This leads to an increase in fatigue and decreases in cognitive performance and self-esteem.[13,14,15,16] it is of prime importance to detect and remediate any handwriting difficulties as early as possible.[5,17]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.